/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #11289990

16KiB, 308x308, 349cd906bfb1e29597025ffa3e72c8a8ba2452a7.jpg

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Fri 10 Jan 00:31:24 2020 No.11289990 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>11289997 >>11289998 >>11290491 >>11290954 >>11291058 >>11291090 >>11292284 >>11292876 >>11292930

FOR THE LAST FUCKING TIME /SCI/, ARE GMO'S BAD OR GOOD?!

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 10 Jan 2020 00:32:19 No.11289996 Report

Quoted By:

>FOR THE LAST FUCKING TIME /SCI/, ARE GMO'S BAD OR GOOD?!
Please stop shouting.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 10 Jan 2020 00:32:20 No.11289997 Report

Quoted By: >>11290025

>>11289990
42

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 10 Jan 2020 00:33:14 No.11289998 Report

Quoted By: >>11290007 >>11290011 >>11291048 >>11291052 >>11292913

>>11289990
they are good, only brainlet retards think they are bad. However, I can tell you the actual bad thing about it is the companies patenting every little genetic change and shitting up the agricultural industry.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 10 Jan 2020 00:36:49 No.11290007 Report

Quoted By:

>>11289998
only right answer

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 10 Jan 2020 00:38:11 No.11290011 Report

Quoted By:

>>11289998
What about gmos not letting plants to eat bugs and fungus, plants need nutrients too.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 10 Jan 2020 00:43:28 No.11290025 Report

Quoted By: >>11290495

>>11289997
no thats the answer to the universe not this question mannn

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 10 Jan 2020 04:20:08 No.11290491 Report

Quoted By:

>>11289990
GMOs are systemic circumcision.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 10 Jan 2020 04:24:11 No.11290495 Report

Quoted By:

>>11290025
Replenishing your forces entirely with rape babies is one aspect of creationist methodology
>regardless this is not how physics works
in the real world

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 10 Jan 2020 04:32:04 No.11290505 Report

Quoted By: >>11291048

GMOs are good, monoculture is bad

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 10 Jan 2020 10:29:27 No.11290954 Report

Quoted By:

>>11289990
Bad, don't listen to Monsanto shills

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 10 Jan 2020 11:52:47 No.11291048 Report

Quoted By:

>>11290505
>>11289998
based posts. GMOs are good.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 10 Jan 2020 11:54:47 No.11291052 Report

Quoted By:

>>11289998
Good man. This is the real problem. Farmers are fucked by gmo financially. Eating them is the same fucking thing as anything grown successfully another way.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 10 Jan 2020 11:57:18 No.11291058 Report

Quoted By:

>>11289990
As far as your health goes they are neither good nor bad, your body won't care if a fish gene is in your corn.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 10 Jan 2020 12:25:09 No.11291090 Report

Quoted By: >>11292290 >>11292915

>>11289990
Depends. Glyphosate resistant crops will contain glyphosate. Glyphosate has been evaluated by the WHO as "probably carcinogenic to humans."

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 10 Jan 2020 21:36:38 No.11292284 Report

Quoted By:

>>11289990
That’s like asking if any food is bad or good.
It depends on what kind, and how much you’re eating.
GMO’s are not inherently bad.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 10 Jan 2020 21:39:26 No.11292290 Report

Quoted By: >>11292877 >>11292915

>>11291090
Ham has been classified as definitely carcinogenic to humans by the WHO.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 11 Jan 2020 02:23:08 No.11292855 Report

Quoted By:

they are good.
t. my genetics professor who's some hotshot.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 11 Jan 2020 02:35:53 No.11292876 Report

Quoted By:

>>11289990
NO
SELECTIVE BREEDING IS NOT GENETIC MODIFICATION

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 11 Jan 2020 02:36:04 No.11292877 Report

Quoted By:

>>11292290
True but, the effects stack.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 11 Jan 2020 03:10:42 No.11292913 Report

Quoted By:

>>11289998
from a human health perspective, you are right.
from an ecological perspective, gmo's can pose a lot of risk although this is never what anti-gmo people are concerned about

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 11 Jan 2020 03:13:23 No.11292915 Report

Quoted By:

>>11291090
this is true. the gmos themselves are harmless but there are some side implications that can be hazardous to human and environmental health. e.g. allowing us to be more liberal with the harmful pesticides
>>11292290
when's the last time somebody sam ham is anything other than bad for you?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 11 Jan 2020 03:27:14 No.11292930 Report

Quoted By: >>11293115 >>11294955

>>11289990
Patenting food is bad, boycott GMOs

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 11 Jan 2020 05:54:44 No.11293115 Report

Quoted By:

>>11292930
Nobody said that better.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 11 Jan 2020 23:06:15 No.11294955 Report

Quoted By:

>>11292930
This, Babylonians had enough

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches