I don't understand Russell's paradox
No.11289888 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Quoted By: >>11290223 >>11290225 >>11290229 >>11292158
I don't understand how you can have a set thats a member of itself.
Everywhere I read, says it's a valid assumption to make, but I don't even understand where one would even come across a set that was an element of itself.
Everywhere I read, says it's a valid assumption to make, but I don't even understand where one would even come across a set that was an element of itself.
