>>11286685>if evolution and natural selection were real, then how come microbes still have the best chance at survival?Because they fill different ecological niches compared to larger more complex life forms
>>11286690>f evolution were real, where are all the intermediate species between two "cousin" species in nature anyway?Depends. Sometimes they are still around. Other times there is no middle species left behind if the entire population of the species evolve as a whole. Sometimes they die out since they fill the same ecological niche as other species that evolve out of them, out-competing them and ultimately forcing extinction on them.
>why are there no intermediates between bonobos and chimpanzees? Why would there be? They are as you said cousin species, so it doesn't even make any sense for to ever have been an intermediate, let alone one still alive today as they evolved out of a common ancestor.
>When did the first two fucking bonobos or first two fucking chimpanzees spawn at the same place at the same time with literally the same genetic mutations allowing them to reproduce?Evolution happens through incremental changes. It would have taken a long time before they were different enough for inter-species reproduction to become COMPLETELY impossible, which is the common standard used for defining species.
You should try to understand what evolution is before criticizing it.
