>>11280923You can even proof it by geometrical progressions and the definition of a repeating decimal, but it is still an identity principle problem, shouldn't equal 1, otherwise the way we use numbers results in A=B ? A != B which is paradoxical.
I don't know why mathematicians refuse to use the arrow (approaches) for the result while they use it for x. So you have instead of ; which should give you paradoxical statements such as 'as x approaches 2, x equals 2'. The refusal from mathematicians to use clear, proper wording and to let notations evolve ('I took 4 months to learn this muddled mess so you gotta do it 2') is what drives people away from learning math, which is undeniably the most important field there is.
>inb4 muh convergence 
