>>11280719Who cares about IQ when everyone is clamped and vaccinated? That's like taking two animals and hitting them in the head with baseball bat, then putting them in a race or something. I mean, who cares at that point? You're not able to accurately assess natural talents or any of the interesting stuff. You're working with a damaged, non-ideal, suboptimal system.
Some were given pitocin.
Some were clamped, some weren't.
Some were clamped after 2 seconds, some after 10, some after 30.
Some got more aluminum and more or less of the vitamin K.
Some got the vaccine dose toward the end, where the mercury had settled, so they got a greater dose. Some got less. There's variance between batches in immunogenic material.
Some were fluoridated, some weren't.
I mean, it's just not relevant or even interesting. What is the attribute under test here? Are we going to follow up the IQ result and look for correlations in lifestyle, ancestry, their "genesis"? Probably not. Are we going to correlate any of the above practices with deficits in certain cognitive subsystems? ie, the visual and spatial areas consume more oxygen and do a lot of remodeling after birth, would more hypoxia screw them up more? Don't know.
It's just a very stupid question. Like that star Trek episode where some lived in the floating city, while others, cognitively hampered by the gases on the surface, remained primitive. Like, what is the attribute and basis under study here. Clamping or none, most people aren't capable of asking these more meaningful questions and certainly wouldn't have the balls to put it in the literature.
