>>11279888So what? The percentages look fairly decent considering ~49% of physicists and ~36% of chemists have NEVER failed to reproduce their own data in their ENTIRE career. Reproduction attempts are slightly biased according to the motivations of financial backers. The researchers themselves are doing solid work for the most part. Though I would like to see reproduction attempt publishings with respect to the scientific field(s).
However, labeling the two most rigourous sciences in existence a pseudoscience is very low quality bait. Saged.
