/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #11265113

12KiB, 765x418, math.png

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Mon 30 Dec 22:45:10 2019 No.11265113 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>11265142 >>11265145 >>11265148 >>11265239 >>11266166 >>11266177 >>11266218 >>11266224 >>11266230 >>11267223 >>11267252

Is this right?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 30 Dec 2019 22:56:03 No.11265135 Report

Quoted By: >>11265145

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 30 Dec 2019 23:02:10 No.11265142 Report

Quoted By:

>>11265113
>Is this right?
Why would it be right?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 30 Dec 2019 23:02:58 No.11265145 Report

Quoted By: >>11265148

>>11265113
yes, literally just the FTC
>>11265135
dumbass

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 30 Dec 2019 23:04:03 No.11265148 Report

Quoted By: >>11265195

>>11265113
>>11265145
imbécil el tipo debería usar d/dt retrasado mental mátate

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 30 Dec 2019 23:21:09 No.11265195 Report

Quoted By: >>11265216

>>11265148
>El ingeniero mostrando su conocimiento de mates básicas
Sería abusar de la notación usar el mismo símbolo para la variable de integración y la variable en los límites. Es una de las cosas que se repite en literalmente cualquier clase de cálculo, incluyendo la prepa. Mátate pinche mongol.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 30 Dec 2019 23:30:16 No.11265216 Report

Quoted By: >>11265222

>>11265195

Abuse of notation? How? The expression inside the brackets is a function of x, and t is a dummy variable.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 30 Dec 2019 23:32:31 No.11265222 Report

Quoted By: >>11265228 >>11265266

>>11265216
Well, it is a dummy variable, but the actual function you are differentiating is the function that for each number x, assigns the integral of that function from x to a constant a. I.e. you are taking the derrivative of a function of x. Why the hell would you take the derivative with respect to t? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_theorem_of_calculus#Formal_statements

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 30 Dec 2019 23:35:34 No.11265228 Report

Quoted By: >>11265233

>>11265222

Fucking mong.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 30 Dec 2019 23:36:59 No.11265233 Report

Quoted By: >>11265238 >>11265266

>>11265228
If you take the derivative with respect to t, you get 0 you fucking retard.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 30 Dec 2019 23:39:20 No.11265238 Report

Quoted By: >>11265249

>>11265233

x has been put into the slot for t

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 30 Dec 2019 23:39:20 No.11265239 Report

Quoted By:

>>11265113
Of course it's right. It's just the ftoc. Only difference is a and x were switched which is why it would be -f(x)

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 30 Dec 2019 23:42:30 No.11265249 Report

Quoted By: >>11265254 >>11265266

>>11265238
Ok? So you are agreeing it is a function of x not t? What the fuck are you spouting you mouthbreather? You sound like a schizo crank.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 30 Dec 2019 23:43:53 No.11265254 Report

Quoted By:

>>11265249

Fucking mong.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 30 Dec 2019 23:49:53 No.11265266 Report

Quoted By:

>>11265249
>>11265233
>>11265222

mongo retardo

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 31 Dec 2019 00:20:56 No.11265331 Report

Quoted By:

This is correct, op. Just consider any polynomial function f and youll see it is obviously true. \(\int_x^a f dt = - \int_a^x f dt\) after all, and then its just the fundamental theorem or calculus

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 31 Dec 2019 06:14:32 No.11266027 Report

Quoted By:

Yes its correct

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 31 Dec 2019 07:37:54 No.11266143 Report

Quoted By:

The absolute state of /sci/

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 31 Dec 2019 08:07:10 No.11266166 Report

Quoted By:

>>11265113
Lel

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 31 Dec 2019 08:17:42 No.11266177 Report

Quoted By:

>>11265113
literally just the FTC brainlet

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 31 Dec 2019 08:42:19 No.11266218 Report

Quoted By:

>>11265113
What about the FTC confuses you, OP?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 31 Dec 2019 08:45:35 No.11266224 Report

Quoted By:

>>11265113
Yes, so long as a remains constant.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 31 Dec 2019 08:47:50 No.11266230 Report

Quoted By:

>>11265113
yes, so long as F is not a function involving x.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 31 Dec 2019 17:06:09 No.11266796 Report

Quoted By: >>11267206

>did calc 1 this semester
>see no way op can be incorrect
>everyone on this thread is saying he isn't
Is it over bros, or am I being trolled

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 31 Dec 2019 19:46:39 No.11267206 Report

Quoted By:

>>11266796
Ehat are you talking about? Did you just filter out all of the posts saying he was correct?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 31 Dec 2019 19:55:11 No.11267223 Report

Quoted By:

>>11265113
The result is correct, but the reasoning isn't because not all functions have primitives.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 31 Dec 2019 20:13:47 No.11267252 Report

Quoted By:

>>11265113
no, its left

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches