>>11262068Tiny == 1/3 to 1/2 of the penile skin.
>>11262071My anecdote maps well onto reality. These things you're mentioning just would not happen to people without other contributing issues.
The theory is self evidently wrong. The foreskin secretes antibodies, removing it exposes the glans to open air and aerobic bacteria it's not designed to deal with.
As far as the middle east etc, it hasn't always been a desert and if you look at the architecture and scale of their history and conquests, they've been highly developed for quite some time. Resources and especially water were not so scarce that they couldn't build structures and raise armies.
Lastly, as far as the past, this bit is speculation but put bluntly I'm going to assume people have always jerked off to some extent. If an uncut man is going to jerk it there are a few ways, but odds are he's going to pull the skin back and use spit as a lubricant. This cleans and removes material. He does his thing, finishes, skin forward, it dries out, aerobes are killed, anaerobes are killed by immune system. If he's having lots of sex that depends as well, but the vagina also seals and has an immune system.
On and on. No more strapping infants into "circumstraints" and amputating parts of their genitals. This should be obvious. Also, look up the ancient Sumerian religions and particularly Enlil of the Anunakki (Sons of Anu, Enki and Enlil) regarding circumcision.
