>>11261337>>11261337this is so ignorant, any activity or advancement in setting up infrastructure on the moon (as we should have been since we first landed there over 50 years ago) is "useful" there is surely more "serious" shit that can be done later by other companies, everyone working together to advance us beyond earth is essential, why make it so competitive in your mind?
>"either spaceX or no one" what a fanboy-like and irrelevant statement.
blue origin is on the same level with even more money behind it and have recently expressed plans for the moon.
Inb4 amazon shill
i'm just saying i think it's great that nasa have started this project, people probably said the mars rover missions were just memes too.