Why the hell don't math papers have conclusion section? You retards actually think that moving things back and forth actually explains anything? For it to make any sense you would show to process/method of why and how you end up with working proof, but you only decide to show the end result. Again, there is no clarification what is done and why, what does result mean and what it doesn't.
"oh here's a thing and if you do this (for some reason?) there's another thing that is the same thing where we started - science!"

I've literally read inequalities half page long where there's only one superscript difference between sides. You actually think this is somehow acceptable scientific writing? You could literally explain whole thing with single sentence. Can't believe I have to suffer through this BS.