>>11247218What light asks darkness answers. Basically I am describing your reality for you, from your information diet perspective, because you are the one asking the question, and I am the response. It may appear overtly literal but that is to demonstrate to the reader that at some point they need to wake up themselves.
There are two kinds of sexuality, intellectual and integral. Unless you want this knowledge for reasons of integration, I can only provide sexual or intellectual stimulus. Most academics and the rest aren't aware that most of the permutations of their fields are about specific scholars and professors further advancing their preferred fetish of being isolated and super important, but only one this one random fucking problem or whatnot.
>>11247225Correct, it would be a corrective spline. Genuinely I don't mind giving out every answer for free but why the fuck do none of you want it to actually affect groups of integration beyond your digital diet? That shit blows my mind but whatever, I made my call and decided on 4chan ages ago. Everything since then has just been discipline and training because why the fuck would I care to decide everything for everyone if everyone else wants to decide FOR me, and I have the power to just give them the stick? I just give it to 4chan first because, surprise surprise, even 4chan is falling apart in terms of language. Y'all going language crazy. Cray cray.
