>>11270099The common ‘difference’ found between the sexes is approximately 3-4 IQ points in the averages. That’s it. That’s also tiny and well within chance based on factors like the sampling bias (more men take the tests, and the type of men that take the tests are biased)
The data from meta-analysis (not single studies, which mean nothing in social science) is abused in bad faith.
When it comes to geniuses, these guys are trying to claim they’re Einstein by association.
That is retarded. Claim to be Hercules at least, he was male too. Aim high in your delusion.
They tend to ignore the fact there are also female geniuses, historically and currently.
Another study:
>By just looking at those figures, it seems to corroborate the conventional wisdom that has been known for decades: the average IQs are about the same and males are a bit more variable.”Remember variable in stats doesn’t mean wrong, necessarily.
>2 point difference Don’t build your seasteader ship to escape the cooties just yet
>Most IQxgender findings are ‘statistically insignificant’, literally. They rarely report this.>1% p value is for medical disciplines like neuroscience. They don’t use it in studies for brain differences between the sexes because they can’t meet that standard. Dwell on this fact. They typically have to lower the standard of proof to publish.>type 1 and type 2 errors present...Another study you see here
>data set:Racially Scottish 11yos in the 1930s. (when women were not allowed to play or think )Yeah......
Most of the Flynn effect is scoring modern test-takers too high and comparing them to old test-takers as if the tests were equally difficult. And becuase the data is normalized Neither do the tests really compare to one another, even their boundary labels differ.
