>>11236286The difference is, you haven't actually provided any decent explanation, or data, just a picture.
You can take pictures of various rocks, and often they'll look almost identical, what matters is the scientific analysis.
The thing is, subspecies are often more genetically distinct from one another than humans are.
For instance, notice that the generation variation between dogs and grey wolves (their progenitor) is greater than the genetic difference between different human populations.
So no, your image is bullshit, and doesn't take into account actual scientific factors.
