>>11235651>Exactly, in Chernobyl they did things that were against their own safety protocols which wethat doesnt matter, power will be run by humans in the foreseable future.
>nuclear is safe>3 mile island, chernobyl, fukuyima>ohhh but those were mistakes, just dont make thosenigga bitch please the whole point is that humans will make mistake, can you guarantee that 100% of all the people that will work in nuclear reactors will be 100% foolproof in 100% of cultures and countries during 100% of economic and political crises while producing 100% of energy of the world.
no you cant, as a matter of fact as capacity increases its almost guaranteed to be a failure
so yes, nuclear will never ever beberver sever lever be a good idea, no matter what you say, even if 0.00000000000000000000000000001% of humanity is extremely stupid then thats enough to get a nuke to work.
the price of dealing with one nuclear accident negates the gain from worldwide power electricty in a year, and at that scale its guaranteed to happen.
And before you go "le huuurrdddiurtyi, le guuurdurti bhhhttt huhut annoonn in cheerneboyl only 1 people died is really small"
yes, firts of all only few people directly died because around 200 billion us dollars were invested in containment measures, you think were gonna be able to pull that? even tough now that 0.0001% of the worlds power is generated with nuclear and theres a catastrophe firmly every 30 years? you think were gonna be able to pay 200 billion when theres one each year?
And evne the chernobyl/fukuyima/3 mile island disasters with all the containment measures held more most of its dead and will be helding because of cancer increasing rates.
cancer increasing rates have been elevate dat hte time of around 1% in all of the world and 10 % in europe so around 1% of cancers deaths from here towards eternity is fault of chernobyl/3island/fushulima style destroyer of status events, imagine multiplying that times all the power plants.
