>>11231069>"no"Well like, by your own logic your wrong. Unless you weren't this poster
>>11230911. I don't know what else to tell you. No gravity, no mass. What would pull the mass there? If there is no gravity and it cancels itself out, then gravity apparently causes repulsion too. Oh wait that doesn't even sound right either. There's another logical flaw in the explanation of gravity.
>mass causes gravity>gravity causes mass to attract>Except for when it doesn't and repulses itself, essentially canceling itself from being defined.>Draw a freebody diagram and integrate of newton's law of universal gravitation for a continuous body over the volume of the earth and find out why. you do know basic vector calculus, right? or else you wouldn't be arguing that physics is wrong, seeing as understanding the math is required to understand the physical concepts.Do you think that all of that liberates you from answering me? You may as well be a catholic trying to explain the holy trinity to me. Everything you just stated relies on the universal constant of G, which we just debunked as being "universal". Unless of course gravity is in fact not "0" at the center of earth.
