/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #11227520

20KiB, 320x223, TR-3B.jpg

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

TR-3B Anti-Gravity Just Spin to Win

Anonymous Sun 15 Dec 08:54:33 2019 No.11227520 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>11227521 >>11227965 >>11228272 >>11228358 >>11228542 >>11229856

Is the TR-3B achieving anti-gravity effects by simply spinning mercury plasma at or over 50,000RPM's? Can you even get such a thing to happen?

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 564168.gif, 2MiB, 450x348

Anonymous Sun 15 Dec 2019 08:56:46 No.11227521 Report

Quoted By: >>11227522 >>11228329

>>11227520
>Anti-Gravity

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Dec 2019 08:58:23 No.11227522 Report

Quoted By:

>>11227521
its truuu!!!

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Dec 2019 09:02:36 No.11227527 Report

Quoted By: >>11228276 >>11229126 >>11229856

lol, mercury plasma. superfluid bose einstein condensate helium maybe.

anyway you can read how it works here
https://patents.google.com/patent/US10144532B2

confirmed operable patents here
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/29232/navys-advanced-aerospace-tech-boss-claims-key-ufo-patent-is-operable

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Dec 2019 14:08:39 No.11227965 Report

Quoted By:

>>11227520
Error propagation in the simulator that we call our universe can cause these kind of glitches.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Dec 2019 14:22:16 No.11227989 Report

Quoted By: >>11228211 >>11228385

Someone explain to me why brainlets think of and treat plasma like magic, and not just stuff that's so hot it behaves slightly differently than a normal superheated gas would...?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Dec 2019 16:30:09 No.11228211 Report

Quoted By:

>>11227989
Cooper pairs

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Dec 2019 17:06:10 No.11228272 Report

Quoted By:

>>11227520

It makes a sound. And it doesn’t go too fast. It can maintain a low flying altitude like a helicopter. I read somewhere that it’s unmanned and that it’s vertical velocity is quicker than its horizontal velocity. It’s considered a drone. Not necessarily a manned aircraft.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Dec 2019 17:07:23 No.11228275 Report

Quoted By: >>11229508

if i spin a rope fast enough over my head, will i eventually take off?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Dec 2019 17:07:37 No.11228276 Report

Quoted By: >>11228315

>>11227527
They're fake.

>To help me understand the underlying theory behind the hybrid craft technology described in the patents, I spoke with Dr. Brian Collett, a Hamilton College physics chair who teaches courses in electromagnetic theory and quantum physics. Collett told me that while patents and peer-reviewed articles about theoretical physics are one thing, the descriptions of the HAUC and the claims in Pais’ research "bear no more resemblance to quantum physics as I understand it than does ‘The Force’ from Star Wars."

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/28729/docs-show-navy-got-ufo-patent-granted-by-warning-of-similar-chinese-tech-advances

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Dec 2019 17:26:52 No.11228315 Report

Quoted By: >>11228395

>>11228276
lmao what a terrible reason. this obviously goes beyond our current understanding of physics

also you're claiming the us navy is lying. why?

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1575869700201.gif, 1MiB, 375x375

Anonymous Sun 15 Dec 2019 17:39:01 No.11228329 Report

Quoted By:

>>11227521
>reverse the gravity!

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Dec 2019 17:50:28 No.11228358 Report

Quoted By: >>11229565

>>11227520
how would spinning mercury really fast counteract gravity?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Dec 2019 18:01:34 No.11228385 Report

Quoted By:

>>11227989
People love to call "energy" things they don't understand. So I would assume that calling it "plasma" is not a really big stretch.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Dec 2019 18:08:20 No.11228395 Report

Quoted By: >>11228409

>>11228315
>lmao what a terrible reason. this obviously goes beyond our current understanding of physics
So a mechanical engineer has a better understanding of quantum physics than an expert in quantum physics? If it's "beyond our understanding" then the explanations in the patents are bullshit anyway, so what is your point?

>also you're claiming the us navy is lying. why?
Where did I say the Navy is lying? The Navy could just be fooled by a con artist or fooled by a fool. Or they could be lying in order to get the Chinese on a wild goose chase. But nothing in these patents indicates they represent anything real.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Dec 2019 18:15:45 No.11228409 Report

Quoted By: >>11228422 >>11228423

>>11228395
>So a mechanical engineer has a better understanding
>If it's "beyond our understanding" then the explanations in the patents are bullshit anyway
Uh, no. If this is real it either comes from reverse engineering alien craft, or the mind of a genius.

>Where did I say the Navy is lying?
The part where you said it's fake, while the navy has confirmed two patents are operable.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO areyoukiddingme.png, 216KiB, 373x360

Anonymous Sun 15 Dec 2019 18:23:33 No.11228422 Report

Quoted By:

>>11228409
>aliens
The caulk of terrible theories.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Dec 2019 18:27:40 No.11228423 Report

Quoted By: >>11228454

>>11228409
>If this is real it either comes from reverse engineering alien craft, or the mind of a genius.
Then why patent it? Obviously the worry is that others would be able to develop the same technology. If this was so special then patenting it makes no sense.

Also, the alien tech idea makes no sense because in order to reverse engineer it we would need to connect it to our understanding of quantum physics. Instead we get gibberish that beats no connection to it. How would a mechanical engineer make up new physics?

>The part where you said it's fake, while the navy has confirmed two patents are operable.
The Navy has claimed they are operable, it hasn't confirmed anything. And this response doesn't make sense since as I already said they could simply be fooled into claiming this rather than lying about it.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Dec 2019 18:44:09 No.11228454 Report

Quoted By: >>11228506 >>11228577

>>11228423
>Then why patent it?
They claim china is investing significantly in the same area and they don't want them to get the patent.

>the alien tech idea makes no sense because in order to reverse engineer it we would need to connect it to our understanding of quantum physics
if it is then it has been worked on secretly for 70 years, that includes any new understanding of physics. Roswell was definitely a cover up.

>The Navy has claimed they are operable, it hasn't confirmed anything
implying claim and confirm is different somehow. if they got fooled into thinking it was operable they would be pretty incompetent.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Dec 2019 19:01:55 No.11228506 Report

Quoted By:

>>11228454
>>Then why patent it?
>They claim china is investing significantly in the same area and they don't want them to get the patent.
>Bossman! I figured it out but the Americans have a patent on it
>Well, I guess we have to give up on our hopes for antigrav tech.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Dec 2019 19:20:30 No.11228542 Report

Quoted By:

>>11227520
how is this thing supposed to counteract gravity? What theory are they citing?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Dec 2019 19:36:00 No.11228577 Report

Quoted By:

>>11228454
>They claim china is investing significantly in the same area and they don't want them to get the patent.
So China has the same alien tech? It must be raining aliens. And what's the point of telling China you have the same? It's not like the Chinese government is going to respect US patents. None of this makes any sense.

>if it is then it has been worked on secretly for 70 years
So why patent it now?

>implying claim and confirm is different somehow.
Confirm means to establish the truth of something. They didn't dip that, just claimed it's true.

>if they got fooled into thinking it was operable they would be pretty incompetent.
As incompetent as you believing the patents are real, yes.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Dec 2019 22:38:29 No.11228927 Report

Quoted By:

JFK warned us about a monolithic conspiracy, perpetrated by a secret society that had combined influence and power over science as well as government. Some of the "known scientific facts" that you take as utterly self evident are lies. For example, there are stable isotopes of every element, why stop at mercury when you can have copernicium?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Dec 2019 00:15:16 No.11229124 Report

Quoted By: >>11229487 >>11229723

Do some research into gyroscopes,
The "anti-gravity" is just conservation of angular momentum.
People assume this is some free energy thing or it uses quantum mechanics.

The faster you spin something, or the denser the gyroscope (that's the reason for the mercury, it's so heavy.)
The more inertia you generate and you can orientate multiple gyroscopes to have a net movement.
For some reason it's regarded as a hoax.

Here is a video of actual proof of something for once.
https://youtu.be/MHlAJ7vySC8

Watch some of his other videos, gyroscopes are possibly some sort of conspiracy lol.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Dec 2019 00:16:38 No.11229126 Report

Quoted By:

>>11227527
This is it. Exactly why the DoD dumps shitloads of money into the whole BEC/Fermionic Condensate deal.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Dec 2019 00:50:21 No.11229194 Report

Quoted By:

I hope this is real because it'd be cool.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Dec 2019 03:25:32 No.11229487 Report

Quoted By: >>11229667

>>11229124
And how the fuck are you gonna make an object hover in air using this only? Stupid.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Dec 2019 03:35:50 No.11229508 Report

Quoted By:

>>11228275
No. Lack of lift due to rope shape and size.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Dec 2019 04:13:19 No.11229565 Report

Quoted By:

>>11228358
Physics n stuff

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Dec 2019 05:25:19 No.11229667 Report

Quoted By: >>11229758

>>11229487
You have several gyroscopes, so say three high speed spinning disks,imagine a hard drive platter, but they all orbit a central electric motor and brake system.
The spindles are all spun up and then the central motor spins all three gyros, so the net force of conservation of angular momentum is either up or down, depending on the direction of the platters in relation to the central motor.
So rapid vertical take off.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Dec 2019 05:56:48 No.11229723 Report

Quoted By:

>>11229124
Um, this is incredible.
What the actual fuck is going on with the universe where this is possible? Some kind of macro-electromagnetic exploit?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Dec 2019 06:20:45 No.11229758 Report

Quoted By:

>>11229667
Unclear what you mean, but there's not gonna be any net force up or down. If this actually worked people would have made it a long time ago.
By the way. Helicopters are REAL flying gyros, they actually apply force to the left or right, depending on the direction of rotation of the rotor, to tilt forward.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Dec 2019 07:29:02 No.11229856 Report

Quoted By: >>11229868

>>11227520
>>11227527
Sounds like pretty much the same thing this guy is doing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VBrx4O10XkI
Except instead of spinning magnetised disks of textured aluminium, they spin mercury?
Schematics are here.
https://docviewer.yandex.ru/view/0/?*=3mB8i86W%2FkA6efvQeBcYlEvCOxR7InVybCI6InlhLWRpc2stcHVibGljOi8vK3g1SmhwbENmRmJkTUkybExGT0x1d1ZSL0RWTjgwY09xUmdtK3V0OUl1MD0iLCJ0aXRsZSI6IkdyYXZpbGV0IC0gQ2hla3Vya292LnBkZiIsInVpZCI6IjAiLCJ5dSI6IjY5NDExNDY2MTUyNDQzMjU0MyIsIm5vaWZyYW1lIjpmYWxzZSwidHMiOjE1MzY5OTc3NTk3MzZ9

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Dec 2019 07:43:07 No.11229868 Report

Quoted By:

>>11229856
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VBrx4O10XkI
This shit is clearly fake. Yeah I want antigravity to be real too, but try not to be retarded.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches