https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v5K1ImzI24M
how solid are his arguments against nuclear energy? he brings up several points backed up by multiple sources, namely:
-energy to consumers would be cheaper under renewables
-baseload power is an outdated energy idea, and that cycling power is the new hotness
-worst case scenarios of nuclear have the capacity to affect entire nations
-long time to get running from construction start
-total emissions only slightly under gas
i did notice that the video barely touched generation IV reactors, how effectively does generation IV reactors address these things? or are these claims not entirely accurate
how solid are his arguments against nuclear energy? he brings up several points backed up by multiple sources, namely:
-energy to consumers would be cheaper under renewables
-baseload power is an outdated energy idea, and that cycling power is the new hotness
-worst case scenarios of nuclear have the capacity to affect entire nations
-long time to get running from construction start
-total emissions only slightly under gas
i did notice that the video barely touched generation IV reactors, how effectively does generation IV reactors address these things? or are these claims not entirely accurate
