>>11213132>some dahliasI think. Need to account for Jamil picking two, three or all four of them.
>>11213139I know, I had just woken up.
>>11213143>3-dimensional numbersR^3 with the cross product was, in fact, studied. Extensively.
>5I don't think anyone ever constructed nice 5-dimensional numbers.
>7Seven was also studied a bit.
And for dimensions higher than eight, the structure essentially goes to hell.
>>11213178No, in this case it's on me, the other one's the proper one.
