Quoted By:
Why did physicists stop looking into this seriously after Paul Dirac? I mean sure, it could be a fluke, but it's not just barely close, it's almost an exact match give or take a zero here or there. It also makes perfect sense that the properties of the universe are this way. In fact, without gravity, this is exactly what would have to happen, right? Although in that case a problem is light traveling forever off into an empty infinity all while from it's own POV its creation and destruction are the same event happening at the same time in the same place, so what could it be interacting with other than the source that spawned it? I don't think it could just redshift away without hitting anything at all ever, or its energy would be lost, unless it was converted into something else like more space through an exotic mechanism. So, I guess there is really no light except between the surfaces of two massive objects or maybe the same object, so this would be impossible in practice anyway.
Anyway, so let's think backwards in time until everything approaches some "infinitely small and dense" point. How would that work? How do you go smaller than "1", when there's literally only this one single object with no other point of reference to compare it to? Or bigger than 1? Infinite even? By that point it's just becoming a unit of measurement, isn't it? So let's say there are two points just before this grand unification, or right after the split depending on your view. One could also say the two points have mass of "infinite / 2" or some retarded shit like that, but that's just the same shit backwards. I mean it's OK when QM does away with infinities, so I guess in this sense it's also logical that there would have to be a "reverse normalization" at some point for it to work.
