What is the proof that induction is a valid technique?
It makes perfect intuitive sense to me. If I know that is true for some natural number and I know that implies for all natural numbers , then being true implies that is true, which implies that is true, which implies that is true, which implies... And then I ultimately deduce by observing this pattern that is true for all natural numbers .
However, that doesn't actually seem rigorous. How do I know that the pattern continues indefinitely? Is there some fundamental axiom I'm just missing? What is it?
It makes perfect intuitive sense to me. If I know that is true for some natural number and I know that implies for all natural numbers , then being true implies that is true, which implies that is true, which implies that is true, which implies... And then I ultimately deduce by observing this pattern that is true for all natural numbers .
However, that doesn't actually seem rigorous. How do I know that the pattern continues indefinitely? Is there some fundamental axiom I'm just missing? What is it?
