>>11199437>Do incels actually have a point?No. The vast majority of them are entitled crybaby manchildren who think that 'the world' and 'women' owe them something. The rest of us know that we have to *earn* people's respect, and *win* affection and companionship from women. It's not supposed to be easy. It's one of the few aspects of Natural Selection that's left in our species. Forgetting birth control for a moment, can you imagine the genetic chaos that would ensue if any male could mate with any female at any time, on demand? Beyond the bare biological concerns, there is the fact that women are also intelligent sentient human beings with their own lives (a fact that the incels of the world conveniently refuse to acknowledge) and their own will, so why should they just stop everything to have their time wasted by someone they find repulsive (physically, personality-wise, or both) and get naked and have sex with them? If you present the same incels with the prospect of sex with a disgusting ugly woman, they'll say 'no' -- more illogic.
Meanwhile they're usually misogynistic, and devalue women in general as a matter of course, but still desire to have sex with them -- more illogic; if you think they're worthless, then why would you want to fuck them? Logically you would want to mate with the highest quality female you can access, yes?
It is my belief that the rise of inceldom has been driven by a few factors, mainly the rise of the internet, with which they can congregate virtually and feed each others' complaints, anger, and sense of entitlement (basically radicalizing others), and the overly-sexual nature of the media, rising over the last few decades. For all we know extra hormone residue in processed foods might be driving oversexualization, too. Then there's the effects of pornography on the male brain, which brings us back to the internet: you can watch porn 24 hours a day, for free, with basic internet connectivity.
