E=mC^2
I get the technical meaning of this equation.
However, this understanding has me wondering many questions about the hidden variables involved. What's the longest form of this equation? (When you include all relevant details as a unit of mass or energy could be observed/measured within space-time?)
Elaboration:
A unit of mass converted to energy 100% will just be a light wave. The size of this light wave is relative to the mass unit converted, right?
Since light is a wave that goes from one point to another point in a straight line, it's 2 dimensional. Hence the squaring.
This is just a representation of the perfect line of this light wave.
Since we assume space-time can "curve" or have shapes that light bends around or follows, the flat E=mC^2 doesn't really represent those differing paths.
So the path of a light wave, isn't able to be represented practically with E=mC^2 in reality. It's a factor that isn't considered by the equation.
Why not build the equation so that the pathway of this energy or light is part of it? The direct squaring just assumes a direct point to point for a light wave, but they don't really move that way. Mathematically there's always just a start and end, but in practical application that's not how it goes.
There is uncertainty, right? If E=mC^2 and light waves moved perfectly according to the flat mathematics and technicality, then a photon from point A would have a perfectly predictable destination at point B.
Show me the version that incorporates uncertainty... Or is this unfinished? Does it not exist? Am I looking for oranges, in an apple orchard?
I get the technical meaning of this equation.
However, this understanding has me wondering many questions about the hidden variables involved. What's the longest form of this equation? (When you include all relevant details as a unit of mass or energy could be observed/measured within space-time?)
Elaboration:
A unit of mass converted to energy 100% will just be a light wave. The size of this light wave is relative to the mass unit converted, right?
Since light is a wave that goes from one point to another point in a straight line, it's 2 dimensional. Hence the squaring.
This is just a representation of the perfect line of this light wave.
Since we assume space-time can "curve" or have shapes that light bends around or follows, the flat E=mC^2 doesn't really represent those differing paths.
So the path of a light wave, isn't able to be represented practically with E=mC^2 in reality. It's a factor that isn't considered by the equation.
Why not build the equation so that the pathway of this energy or light is part of it? The direct squaring just assumes a direct point to point for a light wave, but they don't really move that way. Mathematically there's always just a start and end, but in practical application that's not how it goes.
There is uncertainty, right? If E=mC^2 and light waves moved perfectly according to the flat mathematics and technicality, then a photon from point A would have a perfectly predictable destination at point B.
Show me the version that incorporates uncertainty... Or is this unfinished? Does it not exist? Am I looking for oranges, in an apple orchard?
