>>11198272Your pic is cute but reflects brainlet-tier understanding of how AI are trained.
For example, the beauty contest AI is not deciding which models are more beautiful. It's actually just what human judges would decide.
I'm sure you won't read this being a /pol/tard but looking at pic related:
AI algorithms "determined" that black people need less medical care, even for the same disorder.
https://science.sciencemag.org/content/366/6464/447>At a given risk score, Black patients are considerably sicker than White patients, as evidenced by signs of uncontrolled illnesses. Remedying this disparity would increase the percentage of Black patients receiving additional help from 17.7 to 46.5%. >The bias arises because the algorithm predicts health care costs rather than illness, but unequal access to care means that we spend less money caring for Black patients than for White patients. The algorithm noticed that for blacks we spend less money on health care, and concludes that they don't need care as early as whites (because otherwise, they would be getting it.... right?). When in reality blacks are actually at a higher risk for diabetes and hypertension.
