NASA proof of flat earth debunked

No.11192062 ViewReplyOriginalReport
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CGjFAe018oA
>1. ships don't appear to sink because of curature. refracted light from the air surrounding the water makes the ship appear hidden by waves, or the air acts as a lens due to the temperature caused by the heat of the sun. it is a mirage. not curvature. the reason we cannot see further is due to magnification, weather and obstruction of waves in magnification.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D-NJjCl_Emk
https://wiki.tfes.org/Sinking_Ship_Effect
https://wiki.tfes.org/Sinking_Ship_Effect_Caused_by_Refraction
>2. Eratosthenes shadow experiment started with an assumption. that is a logical fallcy to automatically think the earth is round without using scientific method to prove curvature. there can be other explanations for his shadow observation. the sun could be a local light source. to test this: hovering a flashlight over two salt shakers on a table and observing the angles of the shadows of the salt shakers, is the table flat or a ball?
https://wiki.tfes.org/Eratosthenes_on_Diameter
>3. shadows on the moon and explaning it to be the earths shadow would be correct if you can prove the earth is round and is orbiting the sun and the moon is orbiting aswell. so far proofs one and two are not adequate and debunked. therefore the earth is not round and all heliocentric mechanics are thrown away. other explanations of the lunar cycles that can give accurate are open.
Bonus round:
This Nasa bitch explaining how the sun energy only heats air molecules but not the ISS is bullshit Unless the suns light only selects certain things like air and doesnt heat up the ISS metal plates.
Her logical fallacy of "we see round objects therefore the earth is round" is similar to "i see dogs all the time so therefore my mind resides in a dog, i am a dog!". Her argument of the earth being round would have to be proven much like how a person is able to observe hands and feet not looking similar to a dog's limbs.