>>11193966it's just an implication sign, not an equal sign. the implication is from the equation on the left to the equation on the right, not just from (sqrt(a)sqrt(a))/a to 1/sqrt(a). actually, saying that a numerical expression (for example, (sqrt(a)sqrt(a))/a) implies another (for example, 1/sqrt(a)) is absurd. i made the same mistake at first lawl. here
>>11191325 is just implied that, if , then 1 divided by is (because 1 equals (sqrt(a)sqrt(a))/a, as implied by the left equation)