GW isn't a scientific issue at all but a philosophical one.
Patently, there inexists a means of mathematically assessing the excessively, and possibly, impossibly complex variables, to attend to reasonable scientific and democratic demands.
The collective effects upon the entire known living calls for an unique geopolitical response not possible prior to present sociological and technological amalgams.
Such pressing inquiries themselves are currently unattainable and thus rationally immaterial.
A dispassionate approach linearly results in an unequivocal realisation: that the subject is strictly non-scientific ie. its handling cannot be accomplished in any feasible mathematical engineering such as the ways of physics. Nonlinearity grows past exponentially when probing its components. Popular requests follow psychological, hence incidental, cyontingencies, not sound considerations.
Geopolitical configurations supersede sanity and are irrevocably arrested by expanding propagandas of various incongruous intents.
The individuals, unable to comprehend, however minimally, the topics imposed upon them by mass communication, crumble into faulty expedients that in turn accelerate madness.
Ethics alone, an exclusively philosophical errand, is accessible to the majority in this matter.
There's no 'scientific community' indulged with all life at its inept disposal. Not sciocracy but democracy is agreed by most. The inaction is preferred to the criminal dissimulation and misrepresentation of all pertinent data and distortion of divisive, thus inconvenient, irrespective to relevancy, information.
Patently, there inexists a means of mathematically assessing the excessively, and possibly, impossibly complex variables, to attend to reasonable scientific and democratic demands.
The collective effects upon the entire known living calls for an unique geopolitical response not possible prior to present sociological and technological amalgams.
Such pressing inquiries themselves are currently unattainable and thus rationally immaterial.
A dispassionate approach linearly results in an unequivocal realisation: that the subject is strictly non-scientific ie. its handling cannot be accomplished in any feasible mathematical engineering such as the ways of physics. Nonlinearity grows past exponentially when probing its components. Popular requests follow psychological, hence incidental, cyontingencies, not sound considerations.
Geopolitical configurations supersede sanity and are irrevocably arrested by expanding propagandas of various incongruous intents.
The individuals, unable to comprehend, however minimally, the topics imposed upon them by mass communication, crumble into faulty expedients that in turn accelerate madness.
Ethics alone, an exclusively philosophical errand, is accessible to the majority in this matter.
There's no 'scientific community' indulged with all life at its inept disposal. Not sciocracy but democracy is agreed by most. The inaction is preferred to the criminal dissimulation and misrepresentation of all pertinent data and distortion of divisive, thus inconvenient, irrespective to relevancy, information.
