>>11191096I implied yhat the USA will strong-arm Europe and therefore why wouldn't they also strong-arm Africa? You think some banana republic's dictator is gonna run the nuke plant? It would be either Americans or Africans loyal to the notion America would be trying to propagate. Face it, you have no solution. Your solution would kill be few intelligent Africans/Laotians/Ecuadorians in order to preserve the greater host of dumb retards electing dictators who take out loans they can never pay. Basically, you don't take over the country, you simply btfo their air force, execute everybody who tries to use AA against you, and conquer maybe one square kilometer to place your nuke plant. It's like a medieval castle.
Autonomous weapons are dangerous and difficult to make. That's why you lay down line connecting the 3rd worlders to your power grid and dictate a new law: anyone within xyz km of this electric line will be shot by fully-automated flying electric robot. Can't hack a robot if it's autonomous.
Yeah, this sounds like a 7-year-old's imaginings, but tell me anyone has the slightest chance of shooting even a wooden biplane out of the sky when said biplane has lasers powered by remote lasers at your nuke plant that can survey and annihilate everything beyond the horizon.
Obviously do the same to the Europeans if they are not compliant. Kill every European not inside a metropolis, then kill everything, man, woman, child, elderly or deer, fuck it kill the turtles too, we'll just clone them and reintroduce them into the environment once autonomous ai has matured. Heck, those non-compliant people aren't even contributing to humanity, so there'd be no shame in just depopulating the city by poisoning their water supply or dropping chemical weapons on them, you can skip the building nuclear reactors part if you really wish. It's not like they're contributing if they refuse to comply. We'll just clone them and re-reintroduce European hunter-gatherers 100 years hence.
