/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #11175440

76KiB, 419x449, cat.png

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Mon 25 Nov 10:32:26 2019 No.11175440 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>11175443 >>11175671

>Science is objective guise and not at all political and (((controlled)))

University dumps professor who found polar bears thriving despite (((climate change)))
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/oct/20/susan-crockford-fired-after-finding-polar-bears-th/

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Nov 2019 10:33:28 No.11175443 Report

Quoted By: >>11175462 >>11175466

>>11175440
>>>/x/
>>>/pol/

Faghoax

Faghoax Mon 25 Nov 2019 10:45:56 No.11175462 Report

Quoted By:

>>11175443
>>>/lgbt/

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Nov 2019 10:48:14 No.11175466 Report

Quoted By: >>11175747

>>11175443

not an argument

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Nov 2019 11:09:28 No.11175491 Report

Quoted By: >>11175501 >>11175549

Laws of physics
Mathematics
Chemistry

All of the above are objective and completely testable. It's impossible for them to become political. Climate Change is a cross section of physics, mathematics (statistics) and chemistry. Therefor the predictions made with the models are easily testable and falsifiable to the point where it can't be politicized.

The only argument you can make is that the people make false poltical conclusions based on real science. Not that the science in itself is political since it's based on the objective measurements and underlying physical qualities of the universe.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Nov 2019 11:15:18 No.11175501 Report

Quoted By: >>11175670

>>11175491
contemporary climate science is based on a load of bunk premises

Faghoax

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO joker2.gif, 1MiB, 316x200

Faghoax Mon 25 Nov 2019 11:52:38 No.11175549 Report

Quoted By: >>11175668

>>11175491
>All of the above are objective and completely testable. It's impossible for them to become political

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Nov 2019 13:13:02 No.11175668 Report

Quoted By: >>11175771

>>11175549
Go ahead and elaborate your bait

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Nov 2019 13:15:08 No.11175670 Report

Quoted By:

>>11175501
Such as?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Nov 2019 13:16:17 No.11175671 Report

Quoted By: >>11175775 >>11175778

>>11175440
She wasn't fired from her job, she lost an unpaid affiliation with the University of Victoria. Also her opinion about polar bears is worthless.

https://climatefeedback.org/evaluation/financial-post-publishes-misleading-opinion-misrepresents-science-polar-bears-peril-susan-crockford/

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Nov 2019 14:01:23 No.11175747 Report

Quoted By: >>11175772

>>11175466
What fucking argument is there?
>hehe da Jews control science
Jesus... one day you’ll learn that not every fucking pathetic excuse of a question deserves a formulated response?
This is like someone saying the earth of flat. Why should people engage in their discussions with the intention to argue the correct shape of the earth when the only reason the person believes the earth is flat is because they are inherently ignorant. If you WANT an argument - great, but you need to put in the same amount of quality you expect; when engaging in the argument. You say “>>>/pol/“ (etc.) is not an argument but ignorance isn’t one either.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO pol card.jpg, 99KiB, 566x943

Anonymous Mon 25 Nov 2019 14:16:42 No.11175762 Report

Quoted By: >>11175772

>this thread

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Nov 2019 14:24:52 No.11175771 Report

Quoted By:

>>11175668
That wan't the question or the point first off it is about the fact that what is being presented to people through "publications" and textbooks as truth is well known not to be true and anyone that bucks the dogma is buried.

Second off things that appear to be true due to dressing up a pile of turds like climate change and space time/dark matter etc are indeed testable and objective yet people still believe in complete and total nonsense which is promoted via the above method I already mentioned.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO hoesmad.jpg, 26KiB, 287x431

Anonymous Mon 25 Nov 2019 14:25:55 No.11175772 Report

Quoted By: >>11175809

>>11175747
>>11175762
not an argument

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Nov 2019 14:27:30 No.11175775 Report

Quoted By: >>11175790

>>11175671
>https://climatefeedback.org
Ahh yes this sounds like a highly reputable objective source you found there anon, great investigate work and semantics

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Nov 2019 14:29:31 No.11175778 Report

Quoted By:

>>11175671
ROFL at this website HAHAHAHA.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Nov 2019 14:36:50 No.11175790 Report

Quoted By:

>>11175775
>attacks source
>doesn't even explain how the source is bad
Not an argument. So I guess you agree Crockford is full of shit.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Nov 2019 14:45:25 No.11175809 Report

Quoted By:

>>11175772
Interesting

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches