>>11174923anon, just look at the successful tech guys
>gatesborderline autistic, 8/10 robot
>zuckerbergborderline autistic, 10/10 robot
>larry page and sergey brinborderline autistic, meh/10 robot
>jobs and wozniakjobs was borderline autistic but brilliant at marketing, wozniak was hardware super autistic and too normie to get into corporate shilling
what i am getting at here is that there is an autism complex that causes sufferers to become abnormally obsessed with the next great tech industry money-maker. most people do not become fixated on that kind of thing. but some people do. hence your zuckerbergs and gateses. they are not normal guys. they are weird af. if that's what you want to become, go ahead, try your hand at that lottery. even the guys who win that lottery will probably end up forgotten -- gates tried to leave microsoft to start his legacy and what happened? the stock was crashing and he was in jeopardy of losing his entire fortune. so he got sucked back in. i can assure you -- as soon as Gates dies the entire company will fold and all his stockholders will lose all the money they have invested in that company. his children would only survive provided he diversified, and they'll turn out like all billionaire legacies, like the waltons, who basically 1/8th their wealth every generation.
in other words this obsession with amassing great wealth is basically a failed strategy. most dynasties die out within 1-2 generations because it is a stupid thing to give your children a billion dollars. based Warren Buffett realizes this and declined to enter into this stupid game. his kids will be relatively normal people with a trust fund that will only help them out in dire situations
