>>11168977>Is this a good analogy of Schrodinger's cat? Depends on your point of view.
>Because those plates are clearly *not* broken.Schrodinger's cat is a critique of the Copenhagen Interpretation. And once we're talking about quantum interpretations, we aren't really talking about facts, or even theories.
The interpretations are mostly about finding ways to think about physics when we have only limited knowledge about what's going on.
Schrodinger wasn't _really_ saying the cat is both alive and dead, instead he's criticizing Bohr and Heisenberg.
But it's really almost like arguing semantics, since there aren't any "right" or "wrong" answers, just ones that might help _you_ grasp what's going on.
