>>11171803>The problem is the behaviours you display.it was the only unusual behaviour i displayed before they decided to call me "pacer"
the only other clue to my autism might have been the way i walk
>Awkward behaviours correlate strongly with other awkward behaviourshow do you know that? i haven't heard about this before, i'd like to analyze the source data myself
or is it just another correlation you neurotypicals conjured up?
>some awkward behaviours make people uncomfortablecertainly not walking, so the likely explanation is that they irrationally conjure up with their "logic" that i also must exhibit whatever behaviour makes them feel that way (also presumably irrational process), despite them having no proof or indication thereof
>Focussing on how one particular behaviour is harmless is, again, overly reductivist;i'm not aware of any other behaviour i exhibited before being labeled, again this happened on the very first lecture so not a single person knew anything else about me
>that behaviour is a social signala signal which must necessarily be very weak, since walking is very common behaviour
so again, they're just essentialy guessing from noise
>you're a poor judge of which behaviours appear awkward to othersi've replicated all my actions that day with my girlfriend and she said that only the walking in circles was weird and made her feel uncomfortable (and the fact that i remember it perfectly, as well as me insisting on doing that little experiment)
she's a good judge, she's neurotypical and quite good with social cues and all the irrational things
>social interaction has its own inductive logic, which you are denyingtheir axiomatic systems are often constructed just for them to be able to justify their irrational feeling, useless logic
>reasonably predicted to occur with greater frequency than with neurotypicalssame for crime and race, yet neurotypicals fight racism
inconsistent
>>11173015russia
your statement about autism and race is wrong
