I'm of the understanding that quality is of objectivity. "Of", because it's plausible having Pavlovian responses to garbage media, based on subpar environments. .. "It's not even really debatable." Responses are usually simply "but subjectivity", which is arguing a negative – while scholarly media is already qualifying and quantifying specifics. It's something that effects products, critiques, and other media.

Janny spoiler: https://pastebin.com/Ndc8F1qR