>>11159605Both based and brainlet
Manifesto has a logical progression and is an entertaining read, but ultimately, it's all based on his set of fallacious definitions.
You see logic like "given that X is undeniably true, and leftists do not believe X, it is obvious that leftists have some ulterior motive for denying the obvious truth of X, and that motive could only be..."
Then derives the motive via telepathy.
This is fine in a mathematical sense but before you start mailing out letter bombs, you should probably first verify that your definitions still hold in the setting of the real world outside of your manifesto.
It's hard to explain just how far removed these types are from reality. If you haven't personally interacted with one it's hard to imagine, I know I didn't get it until working as an instructor and actually dealing with them.
They can have excellent deductive reasoning & pattern recognition, giving the veneer of intelligence, but then their inductive reasoning and inference skills are retard level
>paranoid leaves the lab room for a bit>his pencil rolls off his desk and falls to the floor>he returns>angrily shakes his head as he picks it up>after class comes to ask me who put his pencil on the floor>tell him it rolled off>he asks if i might be protecting other students, and i should just admit if i saw someone do it>ask why anyone would do that>"i know they do these things like that to disrespect me because they don't like how serious i am, and it just seemed like you knew what happened but you don't want to tell me for some reason, that's just the feeling i have"absolutely bonkers
