>>11154897>>11156606i think in this context it is pretty clear the idea is not just the abstract existence of god, but rather the idea is like an analysis of pascal's wager, regarding an afterlife. R.M. Huffglue is saying polytheists an monotheists are right for betting on an afterlife (though he has some caveats there regarding how most accurately to target your pascal wager) and then he says atheists are disabled for not taking any bet in favor of the afterlife. sal says the afterlife is probably a bad begt in the first place.
if you think about it, believing in god isn't the same thing as believing in an afterlife, and you guys making that argument is even more retarded than anything else in this thread. even if god existed then why does that guarantee heaven? it just doesn't and the only arguments you have are old superstition books
