Is this the right place to argue ethics? If so then I have a very specific argument in which zoophilia is ok. The only arguments against it that I can see are consent and informed consent. Obviously consent is a gray area but I believe that certain animals can easily give consent to sex but at that point, does "not refusing"=consent because it's obviously not verbal consent. Informed consent can easy be beaten but only in specific cases like dolphins where they are known to have sex for pleasure. I'm into zoophilia but won't act on it considering the many risks and the fact that I can't condone it morally. If this is the wrong place I'll take it to /an/ but I feel as if they're are a bit biased.