/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #11151173

60KiB, 550x491, thinking frog.jpg

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Sat 16 Nov 06:45:51 2019 No.11151173 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>11151183 >>11151191 >>11151197 >>11151254

What is time?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 16 Nov 2019 06:49:28 No.11151183 Report

Quoted By: >>11151206 >>11151557

>>11151173
It's time to fuck off, ape poster.
Kill yourself.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 16 Nov 2019 06:50:20 No.11151185 Report

Quoted By:

The opposite/converse/inverse/convert/invert/opos/anverse of space!!!!!!!!

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 16 Nov 2019 06:52:08 No.11151191 Report

Quoted By: >>11151206

>>11151173
a scalar parameter that increases monotonically in accordance with the second law of thermidynamics

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 16 Nov 2019 06:53:26 No.11151197 Report

Quoted By:

>>11151173
Time is the 4th dimension of space-time.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 16 Nov 2019 06:55:00 No.11151201 Report

Quoted By:

time is just a method of comparison of movements. while you go to school, the clock goes from 0 to 1. just that, nothing more. it's not that relevant for Physics in theory, it's more a practical tool, an instrument.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 16 Nov 2019 06:55:47 No.11151206 Report

Quoted By:

>>11151183
Lighten up, big boy. ;)
>>11151191
That's the definition I was looking for. Thanks.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 16 Nov 2019 06:58:44 No.11151213 Report

Quoted By:

Think of the universe as a static point object which contains all past present and future events coded in the interactions of massless particles. Time is the result of that object being read and displayed much like data on a hard drive being displayed to a screen in sequence.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 16 Nov 2019 07:11:16 No.11151238 Report

Quoted By: >>11151314

when things stop to move there will be no time anymore, because there would be no reference.

what if they instantly start to move again? then it would be like nothing happened, you wouldn't be able to tell me for "how long" this phenomenon happened.

is this a real or philosophical question? for reality nobody would even realize this and the universe would keep going on

it would be senseless to discuss for how long "time has been stopped."

the end of times would be when things stop to move. there would be no time anymore.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 16 Nov 2019 07:14:16 No.11151246 Report

Quoted By:

when things stop to move it is very likely that all the universe would be destroyed and only elementary particles that do not move would fulfill it. like a dead sand.

~S/$\S

~S/$\S Sat 16 Nov 2019 07:18:28 No.11151254 Report

Quoted By:

>>11151173
That which submits to recognition, recall, and representation.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 16 Nov 2019 07:22:47 No.11151264 Report

Quoted By: >>11151314

I'm correcting myself, in case time stops for a second, maybe there would be a chance for not seeing the universe getting destructed. But if times ends for real, it's pure destruction, everything would to the most elementary particle.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 16 Nov 2019 07:23:51 No.11151270 Report

Quoted By: >>11151314

go to*

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 16 Nov 2019 07:31:13 No.11151283 Report

Quoted By: >>11151314

when I mean a second I mean an instant. A second would be enough to kill everyone on Earth.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 16 Nov 2019 07:31:49 No.11151284 Report

Quoted By:

Thyme?
It's a spice!!
Lol.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 16 Nov 2019 07:56:42 No.11151314 Report

Quoted By:

>>11151283
>>11151270
>>11151264
>>11151238
Please just fucking stop, you're embarrassing every thinking mind in existence with your attempts at communication

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 16 Nov 2019 09:22:52 No.11151431 Report

Quoted By:

Do yoy have the tyme to listen to me wine.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 16 Nov 2019 09:24:46 No.11151435 Report

Quoted By:

I think it makes most sense to think of time in terms of "temporal velocity".

In that sense time is the same as space, except you can only go forward and only have indirect control over how fast you go. So basically accelerating in any spatial direction also means accelerating away from the surrounding space-time's velocity through time. An inert observer outside a strong gravitational field would be in free fall through time and naturally wouldn't be able to see any clocks going faster than his.

This restriction guarantees a smooth and causally well-behaved space-time everywhere and only further requires that accelerating massive particles to c is impossible.

Gravity is just temporal (4d) distance projected to 3 dimensions and the field just converts between spatial and temporal velocity/position.

tl;dr: Time is what happens when the black hole is so big you stop worrying about becoming noodle.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO Gorilla-Buffalo_Zoo.jpg, 943KiB, 1488x1984

Anonymous Sat 16 Nov 2019 11:03:11 No.11151557 Report

Quoted By:

>>11151183
no u

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches