>this is true, why do you care, whats the motivation? how did i come up with this proof? fuck you thats how
>now, through symbolic salad it follows that the assumed true theorem is indeed true
>it is up to the reader to piece together my argument, i won't even give an overview of my proof because fuck you.
why do mathematicians do this? do they not understand the importance of giving the reader first an overview of what is it follow so the reader can piece together everything as they read?