Listen me here, does this make sense or am I too stoned?

What if we can track enough data about a person to make a graph-based model of his life, where vertices are "situations" that they are in (not sure about the granularity that consists of a situation, probably not so fine like atoms interactions or else it will impossible to model), and the edges are their order of progression in time.
Then those individual graphs are subgraphs of a global graph,"the human graph" describing all human situations, and there would be cycles in this graph because no "situation" is really unique, there are repetitions in actions that an individual makes, and its not even unique situations between situations either, there a lot of shared situations(and remember, a situation isn't too granular, the granularity is inversely proporcional to amount of cycles in the human graph).

This would be the best argument for the "hurr we are one" retards that dropped acid for the first time rofl
But maybe its also a good idea worth exploring? Should I take it to my graph theory professor(that also knows about data science)?