>>11123485>says nothing about semenWhat part of "endogenous increase" of testosterone did you fail to understand, midwit. Imagine being so stupid that you cannot even understand what is being discussed.
>entirely unrelated, about sperm count and T in relation to vasectomyImbecile. It shows that semen itself contains androgens, a premise which you seemed to dispute. The actual aim of the study is immaterial.
>about behaviorBehavior driven by intravaginal absorption of the constituents of semen, including androgens. It was absolutely relevant.
>So you started with a conclusion you thought sounded about right and then you dug through the literature to try and find something that might support it. Got it.You asked for a source for a basic fact of reproductive endocrinology, i.e. that for women, an increase in testosterone is observed following copulation. There are two factors to this, 1. Endogenous hormonal production, which was demonstrated in the very first link, and 2. Exogenous, from deposits semen from the male, supported by the second two. The only reason I went out of my way to find a source because you are a midwit, incredulous at a such basic premise, something that if you went to medical school you would have learned. "Got it" summarizes your entire 110 IQ redditor basic NPC logic. Kill yourself.
