>>11115615There's an error 3 lines in already.
>because we have 2 (1)s on one side of the equation and 1 (1) on the other sideThere's one on both, that's literally what "1 x 1" means.
You have a single (1).
Just how "2 x 2" means you have two (2)s.
This retard just doesn't understand the notation he's using.
