>>11107864By refuting about 80 years of physics.
After that, you need to modify your view of duality to one of coincidence, rather than causality and quantum effect.
By that point, you can establish, that gravity is a side effect of photons interacting with baryonic matter.
This reduces the idea of a photon down to the dated assumptions about gravitons.
Tachyon's idea at that point becomes the "ether" or "light wave" idea.
If you're still with me, that means this:
Photons are the manifestation of the Tachyon ether interacting with baryonic matter at contact points.
The contact points are the planck moment where some form of matter touches Tachyon ether, on more than one axis of the Tachyon ether at the same time.
Matter that only touches the Tachyon ether on one axis is not baryonic matter.
More matter appears to acrete more mass because larger quantities of contact points with the Tachyon ether groups together on an axis tensor that is not observable from within space-time.
So... Gravity making stars and planets and black holes, is just because there's more possible points for the "light wave" to hit the matter and drag it on that tensor out of space-time.
There would need to be some kind of filter there, preventing that matter from exiting space-time.
This model can only be adequately proven or disproven if we can observe the inside of a black hole event horizon and then retrieve that information.
If matter inside of a black hole is just exiting space-time, then the tachyon model makes more sense.
If that matter is just retaining it's place in space-time indefinitely, then our current model is correct.
Prepare to wait out Hawking radiation.
Oh wait, did we do that already?
Oh, and when the black hole dispersed, no energy or mass was lost from space-time?
Oh. Then Tachyons are bullshit and this thread is a waste of time and energy.
