/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #11106436

21KiB, 1147x384, primes.png

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Wed 30 Oct 22:52:12 2019 No.11106436 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>11106913 >>11107525 >>11107749 >>11107776

Checkmate mathlets

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 31 Oct 2019 00:19:22 No.11106630 Report

Quoted By:

Retard

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 31 Oct 2019 02:26:24 No.11106913 Report

Quoted By: >>11107226

>>11106436
What are you talking about OP? Of course there are finitely many primes, the largest prime is 2310

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 31 Oct 2019 05:53:13 No.11107226 Report

Quoted By: >>11107234

>>11106913
2310 can't be prime; it's divisible by 2

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 31 Oct 2019 05:59:43 No.11107234 Report

Quoted By: >>11107269 >>11107400 >>11109876

>>11107226
No i think you're mistaken. The only numbers that divide 2310 are 1 and 2310, since its a prime number as I stated before

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 31 Oct 2019 06:28:34 No.11107269 Report

Quoted By: >>11109505

>>11107234
holy moly, it checks out, this changes everything!

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 31 Oct 2019 08:15:06 No.11107400 Report

Quoted By: >>11107413 >>11107415 >>11107515 >>11109468 >>11110644 >>11111590

>>11107234
2310 = 2 * 3 * 5 * 7 * 11. Maybe you mean 2311.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 31 Oct 2019 08:19:05 No.11107413 Report

Quoted By: >>11109468 >>11110644

>>11107400
No, I think he meant 2310. It’s not divisible by any number except itself and 1. Just try it.
2311 on the other hand is divisible by 2, 3, 5, 7 and 11

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1485584521422.png, 152KiB, 384x384

Anonymous Thu 31 Oct 2019 08:20:25 No.11107415 Report

Quoted By:

>>11107400
>using multiplication
Have you CHECKED each of those calculations using the distributive law?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 31 Oct 2019 10:17:13 No.11107515 Report

Quoted By: >>11110644

>>11107400
That doesn't look right to me, 2310 is clearly the last prime number

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 31 Oct 2019 10:28:12 No.11107525 Report

Quoted By:

>>11106436
You didn't discover anything new. This has been known for thousands of years: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euclid%27s_theorem

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 31 Oct 2019 14:10:54 No.11107749 Report

Quoted By:

>>11106436
What exactly is the proof here? How did you get this equality?

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO lAxMD4d1.jpg, 45KiB, 512x512

Anonymous Thu 31 Oct 2019 14:20:01 No.11107776 Report

Quoted By: >>11107930 >>11113263

>>11106436
nice try, but there can't be infinitely many primes because there are only finitely many numbers

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 31 Oct 2019 15:56:40 No.11107930 Report

Quoted By:

>>11107776
BASED

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 01 Nov 2019 05:15:34 No.11109468 Report

Quoted By:

>>11107400
He's (->) right, you know >>11107413

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 01 Nov 2019 05:45:37 No.11109505 Report

Quoted By:

>>11107269
I'm waiting for my fields medal

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO How.jpg, 29KiB, 584x362

Anonymous Fri 01 Nov 2019 12:18:57 No.11109829 Report

Quoted By: >>11109838 >>11109863 >>11109871 >>11110966

How does this work?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 01 Nov 2019 12:30:16 No.11109838 Report

Quoted By:

>>11109829
It doesn't. 11x10 is not a square.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 01 Nov 2019 13:01:17 No.11109863 Report

Quoted By: >>11109867 >>11109871

>>11109829
1x1 right angle triangle is not possible would have to be 1x1.1

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 01 Nov 2019 13:07:10 No.11109867 Report

Quoted By:

>>11109863
Cut a 1x1 square diagonally
What did you just make?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 01 Nov 2019 13:10:24 No.11109871 Report

Quoted By:

>>11109829
It's because a 1x1 triangle would not be collinear with the diagonal of the rectangle

>>11109863
Is correct, but could have worded it better

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 01 Nov 2019 13:15:35 No.11109876 Report

Quoted By: >>11110628

>>11107234
Well clearly also -1 and -2310, but I assume you intentionally ignored numbers associated to the two divisors you mentioned.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 01 Nov 2019 21:01:58 No.11110628 Report

Quoted By: >>11113221 >>11113242

>>11109876
Negative numbers don't exist

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 01 Nov 2019 21:10:35 No.11110644 Report

Quoted By: >>11110660

>>11107400
>>11107413
2310 is divisible by 16 because the last two digits are divisible by 5, therefore it is not prime

>>11107515
the last one must end in 1 or else it would just be divisible by the last digit number

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 01 Nov 2019 21:18:54 No.11110660 Report

Quoted By: >>11111012

>>11110644
Assume 16 | 2310.
We have by (11106913) that 2310 is prime.
Thus 16 -|- 2310, a contradiction.

So, 16 does not divide 2310 and so 2310 is confirmed to be prime.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 02 Nov 2019 00:07:21 No.11110966 Report

Quoted By:

>>11109829
because there are only finitely many prime numbers

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1.png, 5KiB, 220x229

Anonymous Sat 02 Nov 2019 00:34:09 No.11111012 Report

Quoted By: >>11111040

>>11110660
>16 * 2310 = 11106913

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 02 Nov 2019 00:55:44 No.11111040 Report

Quoted By:

>>11111012
sorry but you are the retard here, the anon has shown the proof clear as day. If you can't understand it then I am sorry but you should probably go back to kindergarten.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 02 Nov 2019 05:41:03 No.11111590 Report

Quoted By:

>>11107400
>Dubs
>Not knowing primes
You are disgrace. Just read Disquisitiones Arithmeticae it should explain why you are gay retard

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 02 Nov 2019 23:54:14 No.11113221 Report

Quoted By:

>>11110628
based

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 03 Nov 2019 00:06:00 No.11113242 Report

Quoted By: >>11113246

>>11110628
only the natural numbers exist.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 03 Nov 2019 00:09:46 No.11113246 Report

Quoted By:

>>11113242
not based, what about inf-hat?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 03 Nov 2019 00:20:50 No.11113263 Report

Quoted By: >>11114115 >>11114623

>>11107776
What's the largest number?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 03 Nov 2019 00:41:05 No.11113303 Report

Quoted By:

the absolute shit on this board.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 03 Nov 2019 00:54:46 No.11113324 Report

Quoted By:

2310 is prime because it gives the same number when backwards.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 03 Nov 2019 11:47:17 No.11114115 Report

Quoted By: >>11114515

>>11113263
>there are finitely many trees on earth

>well then how many trees are there?

not an argument

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 03 Nov 2019 15:46:34 No.11114515 Report

Quoted By:

>>11114115
Oh but it is

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 03 Nov 2019 16:43:12 No.11114623 Report

Quoted By:

>>11113263
your weight, in kilograms

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches