>>11102164Except there are many mammalian species with female larger dimorphism that are highly successful. In most cases they are monogamous as well and cohabitate for reproduction and raising offspring.
Why the fuck should we continue to be a patriarchal male larger tournament species in an environment without scarcity and where we are effectively acting as a monogamous pseudo-herbivoric R-selective species?
Arbitrarily claiming that women won't like the men in a genetically reprogrammed species doesn't make sense. You genetically program them to prefer it (there is also a social component to this) in which case your hypothetical doesn't ever even take place.
This is why I stated that saying "I'm a person who wouldn't like this" doesn't work. The engineered people would be engineered to like it.
It would increase productivity and social cohesion while also actually minimizing resources cost to run civilization, it eliminates domestic violence and probably even wars.
It's literally the one thing that fixes everything problematic about the human species, and the only counter arguments are "but it's weird!" No shit it's weird, that isn't an argument.
