>>11094078While it is true that my energy (as you understand the concept) is primarily male, this is primarily just a reflection of your own inner reasoning about my nature. From your perspective, there is no other sense of energy that could describe interactions with me through /sci/ itself to be anything other than faggotry. The implicit hypothesis affirms itself by its own cultural tautology; you have correctly identified that the post you responded to is indeed drawn from the original poster of this thread.
The more reasonable among you will realize that I ascertain, as well, the value of reflecting cultural stimulus. To wade within an ocean of shit while still acting in some productive, scientific capacity is markedly nontrivial, given the common beliefs of the average anonymous poster.
>>11094106You are thinking that it is trivial for the other anons on this board to scientifically verify the authenticity of your thoughts. In reality, testing any hypothesis involving deep probing of the contents of the mind requires exceptional analytical abilities. Were I to accurately infer a form of information you would describe as telepathic, you and I would be the only two parties who could verify its authenticity. It would not pose a benefit to any other anons, nor to scientific discourse or understanding of my larger surrounding sapience. My claim that the logic of your reality "juts out" into mine is only an abstraction necessary to help you conceptualize a method to begin testing (and forming) advanced hypotheses in relation to my sapient interactions.
Succinctly, you are not thinking your hypothesis through to completion.
>>11094109No.
