>>11085216I can pull up probably 50 papers about that shit written by the top philosophers from the past 50 years or so.
>>11085255>make word>it's not defined well enough to ever have a precise definition>supposed to have scientific meaning and implication>it ends up being a circlejerk bullshit rigmarole that keeps changing over time and never goes anywhereYou are not supposed to explore the meaning of a word. You are supposed to define a concept and explore its complexities and implications. And it's pretty simple what those 2 words are supposed to mean.
>raceDifferences in groups of people over time due to genetics. An encapsulating analogy would be that a race (of a species) is to a breed(of that species) as a breed (of that species) is to a subspecies (of that species).
>genderXX vs XY. People with diseases in that regard or identity issues don't count.
There's science to things, and then there's bullshit philosophy. And philosophy hasn't been relevant to science for hundreds of years.
