/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #11083538

77KiB, 900x900, unnamed.jpg

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Tue 22 Oct 23:13:41 2019 No.11083538 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>11083540 >>11083549 >>11083561 >>11083562 >>11083654 >>11083697

>UFO threads on /sci/ are accepted in 2019
>just a year or two ago they would get deleted
What happened?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 22 Oct 2019 23:14:41 No.11083540 Report

Quoted By:

>>11083538
they would? man the mods really got low quality after comey stopped being their boss....

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 22 Oct 2019 23:18:16 No.11083549 Report

Quoted By: >>11083556

>>11083538
>Tic-Tac get me angry
>No thread about Tic-Tak!!!!

This is what it’s like when the geocentric-fags started realizing their views are wrong

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 22 Oct 2019 23:20:34 No.11083556 Report

Quoted By: >>11083560 >>11083910

>>11083549
tic-tac was an IR camera imaging relic

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 22 Oct 2019 23:23:17 No.11083560 Report

Quoted By: >>11083588

>>11083556
take your meds

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 22 Oct 2019 23:23:23 No.11083561 Report

Quoted By:

>>11083538
UFOs are a real phenomenon by definition. Not necessarily ayyy lmaos

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 22 Oct 2019 23:23:26 No.11083562 Report

Quoted By:

>>11083538
It's not an ayylmao, but when the US Military recognizes the existence of something they couldn't identify, it at least warrants discussion.

Also, wow you're lame. Critical thinking does not involve constant immature cynicism.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 22 Oct 2019 23:23:54 No.11083565 Report

Quoted By:

I'm also skeptical about these things, but to their credit lately the US military has been pretty open about having seen things they classify as UFOs. It even made headlines for a while a few months ago.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 22 Oct 2019 23:32:22 No.11083588 Report

Quoted By: >>11083606

>>11083560
>dude dont offer reasonable explanations to phenomena

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 22 Oct 2019 23:38:17 No.11083606 Report

Quoted By: >>11083623 >>11083915

>>11083588
That’s not a reasonable explanation, the US Air Force ruled it out and called it an unidentified flying object, with pilots describing it as above the modern day capabilities of our own flying craft, including no need for aerodynamic shape and no need for a (visible) thrust or propeller or other conventional propulsion system, with impossible for human Gs.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 22 Oct 2019 23:44:16 No.11083623 Report

Quoted By: >>11083643 >>11083659

>>11083606
the air force was wrong. it was an imaging relic. nobody saw it with the naked eye, they were all looking at their IR camera, and this sort of relic is easily reproducible in more mundane settings

the reason the air force is allowing this crap to stay alive is because 1) they like stupid conspiracy publicity because they like stupid theories about what they're doing to well up to obfuscate correct theories about what they're really doing and 2) because they don't want to tell their pilots that the cameras they are trained to watch can make weird illusions in corner cases. they'd rather have their pilots have full faith in the technology. that's because pilots who say "i don't trust the IR images" won't use it and will get fucked in combat at a higher rate than them getting fucked over by trusting an admittedly imperfect technology

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 22 Oct 2019 23:51:19 No.11083643 Report

Quoted By: >>11083660

>>11083623
>citation needed
Air Force confirmed UFO discussion = /sci/ and /g/
Air Force is lying and not teaching pilots to recognize false images on their equipment = /x/ and /pol/

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 22 Oct 2019 23:54:43 No.11083654 Report

Quoted By:

>>11083538
Consipracy theories became shillary, q-anon, sandy hook, deep state, etc.
Now ufo's, bigfoot, 5G dangers, state surveillance etc. are just theories
Vaccine doubt and flat-earth now lean toward anti-scienceism, with cell phone fears gradually joining their ranks.
In summary there are ever increasing categories of things.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 22 Oct 2019 23:55:30 No.11083659 Report

Quoted By: >>11083666

>>11083623
Prove you're not a virgin and I'll answer your questions. Provide scientific evidence that you're not an incel.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 22 Oct 2019 23:56:16 No.11083660 Report

Quoted By:

>>11083643
totally backwards bro. i am willing to admit that maybe this is worth a /sci/ discussion, but /sci/ is unanimously in favor of "it was just a regular scientific thing" instead of ayyylmao /x/ shit

/pol/ OTOH is probably like "this is the jews using their mastery of the media to false-flag trump" which fortunately hasn't appeared in this thread so far

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 23 Oct 2019 00:00:18 No.11083666 Report

Quoted By: >>11083675 >>11083695

>>11083659
hmmmm, how do i provide non-doxxing scientific evidence of my own non-virginity.... good challenge. i don't think that's really possible right, because then the evidence would have to point to actual me rather than anyone else. but maybe i can make a good anecdote a virgin wouldn't be able to make up?

okay, here goes: my gf gets real horny on her period. this makes no evolutionary sense but it is true. i've eaten her pussy when she has a tampon in, i know it's weird, but it's not a big deal. just avoid the vag and focus on the clit. the added horniness of menstruation makes it easier to succeed at giving her an orgasm, like i'd say the chances go from 1 in 4 to 1 in 2

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 23 Oct 2019 00:05:08 No.11083675 Report

Quoted By: >>11083692

>>11083666
This is exactly what an incel would say.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 23 Oct 2019 00:10:15 No.11083692 Report

Quoted By:

>>11083675
good argument

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 23 Oct 2019 00:11:54 No.11083695 Report

Quoted By: >>11083719

>>11083666
I've gone down on a girl who on her period ended up with blood all over my mouth and hand, wasn't that bad
6/10 would still recommend

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 23 Oct 2019 00:12:08 No.11083697 Report

Quoted By:

>>11083538
Evidence of UFOs

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 23 Oct 2019 00:19:41 No.11083719 Report

Quoted By:

>>11083695
gross but sorta hot. i hope she “rewarded” you for that

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 23 Oct 2019 01:39:38 No.11083910 Report

Quoted By:

>>11083556
No, you're thinking of 'Gimbal.'

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 23 Oct 2019 01:40:44 No.11083915 Report

Quoted By:

>>11083606
Navy, I think you mean. And that is not what they said.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches