>>11083033>Minor differences prove men walked on the Moon?No. Lunar rocks are evidence, not proof. There is no such thing as proof.
>No two rocks are identical, so why expect any supposed lunar rocks to match perfectly with any other random rock from the Earth?Read the article again. Lunar rocks have a composition which doesn't make sense if you assume they were found on Earth in the past few million years.
>Ask the NASA astronaut what he means by it.I've already explained about the tooling and fine adjustments being lost. What do you think he meant considering you put so much weight on his quote?
>He wants to go back to the MoonAnd do you think he'd bankroll such a mission?
>Soviets are not to be trusted, they were in a psychological war with the USAll the more reason for them to expose any supposed fakery by the US. They didn't. Cope.
>I am not the military to pay for itWhat does this even mean.
>Let the military complex pay for itWhy? Why should they pay for it? Can you come up with an argument convincing enough that they'd willingly part with billions of dollars for it?
>Also, it should be cheaper with outsourcing and globalism to build rocketsYou have absolutely no idea how government programs are run, do you?
>The program was canned because it was part of the cold war The program was canned because there was not much political or public support left for the missions after they landed six times. There's only so many things you can do with three people on the moon and a limited payload capacity.
>no one went to the Moon outside of Hollywood studiosEvidence?
