>>11079387>and intolerant to non conformist ideas such as race realism.It's because race realism isn't a real scientific idea. It goes against almost everything we know about genetics, epigenetics and basic evolutionary concepts. Anyone that actually looked at the numbers and read the papers about this topic know that race realism is just pseudoscience based upon misinterpertation of a very low sample set of data. It's the anti-vax equivalent of racial studies.
If the actual numbers and studies said something else than I would've personally promoted the lynching of niggers. However that isn't the case and since I and most of /sci/ is the type of person that base their worldview on raw data and change it accordingly it's only rational that most of /sci/ would shun race realism as the pseudo-bullshit it is.
/sci/ is apolitical we hold the view that the data suggests is closest to actual reality. No one gives a fuck about politics.
/sci/ is just as likely to say political incorrect stuff if the science determines that to be the case. For example /sci/ doesn't support transgender trash because it's unscientific.
Therefor /sci/ isn't "reddit" since reddit is mostly preoccupied with certain political views. People like you are as well just in the opposite way to reddit. /sci/ just acts based on what the numbers and models tell us about reality no matter what the political opinions about those things are.
If anything both "your type" and "reddit" are faggots. Leave /sci/ alone with your bullshit.
