>>11077891>peasants owned land something very few non-boomers do.Wrong. In feudalism, the entire point of the system was that the lords owned everything. The kings didn't want (or had the resources) to have a full legal record of every bucko having their house, but they could certainly scatter around some feudal lords around their land and then meet with them every now and then to check that everything was fine and dandy. Peasants DID NOT own land.
>life is not too good for revolution. I know people in the lower classes, and they have it pretty rough. often they need to have at least 4-5 people sharing a crummy apartment working full time to barely make ends meet. the cost of living is so much higher than income nowadays and this ratio will continue to increase till revolution.This is bad but will they kill politicians for it? I don't see any politicians dying so my conclusion is that their life is too good. And it certainly is, peasants had it much worse. Trust me.
>pic relatedThat is just the effect of more people competing for the same amount of land. Doesn't really have to do with the rich. Trust me, if we capped the price of land so that your curve was horizontal, some billionaire could buy the entire remaining land in the earth right now. You'd be helping them, not the poor. Supply vs demand man, come on!
>also no gods, no masters.Then kill. Until I see some guy shooting a politician through the skull, my conclusion is that your life is too good. My life is too good. You know how I know? Because I've never killed a politician.
