>>11068591Well, does environment respond only when it's conscious?
Is it not conscious after you have modeled it?
Unconscious environment can be dissatisfied with your verdict.
Like Christians to Christian god. He show them the way, and then he are for blame for anything, than there it's only one that can change it, because he's responsible for the problem. "Imaginary friend"
So we have bunch of people who cannot take responsibility for their actions, and bunch of people that can.
Somethings are only we can blame abstract principles from, because it's really unreal and responsible to blame single person from "rules" of collective that ware introduced by the collective.
I think if a rock or something like lat rat colony makes a decision, and doctor just counts them up, even thou improperly, it's lab rats who discovered something, observer just passed reality along...
Have you chosen to be born?
You take responsibility afterwards, or you cannot choose.
You just fucked up being born if your world is wrong,...
There is no final resolution of universe, planets, etc... There is whole decision trees, but people that want to tell that strictly you are idiot, because somebody told them cut of situation which doesn't explained whole situation you're in... Those are the wrong.
Income to survive. Survive to kids. Kids survive to income. Have more income. ( Life doesn't make sense, why would I same function depression )
Well, people who tried to make pork it's food by enclosing it made mistake.
We could be free range humans and we would taste better, now buildings are done, if you know that solid ground has some meaning, there is lot of people you can help...
I think that leaving unanimate subjects in place for now and walk around to see if there is something different in the world we haven't yet imagined out of data you have is quite a good idea.
